![]() ![]() Admittedly, one of the things I like about Windows is the way you can customise it for the task at hand to get that extra ounce of performance. Furthermore (and especially on Windows PCs) programs require certain system tweaks to work at their best (graphics acceleration on, graphics acceleration off, or whatever). More and more software demands that you essentially tie up the entire machine to run the program. Now, it's "sub‑minimum requirements." And my Power Computing PowerMac was eliciting comments like "too bad you have such an old computer" until Power Computing took pity on me and let me trade it in for a newer model, so I could run the software I'm being asked to review. Ditto processors: my 166MHz Pentium PC was actually considered cool as little as a year ago. To begin with, Anderton's new Rule Of RAM is that no matter how much you have, the next program you need to review will require twice as much. But now, whenever I get assigned some new program to review, I get a sense of impending doom and foreboding. I used to look forward to having some new piece of software to check out. Craig Anderton explains why the dove of software‑reviewer happiness has flown out of his life, to be replaced with the turkey of user beta‑testing hell.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |